Editor's Pick | Vol. 4 | Issue. 33

Who Pays for Drupal’s Shared Work?

A dark blue editorial graphic uses architectural blueprint drawings as a backdrop for a feature about funding shared Drupal infrastructure. The headline asks who pays for Drupal’s shared work and frames the issue as turning shared infrastructure into shared responsibility.

Recent audited figures give Drupal’s sustainability debate a concrete baseline. The Drupal Association says unrestricted reserves are about $960,000, equal to 2.3 months of operating expenses and below the board’s three-month minimum. Its 2025 accounts put Drupal.org and supporting services at about $2.1 million in programme expenses, without a dedicated funding mechanism. The question is no longer whether shared work has a cost, but how those costs become recurring commitments.

The same problem appears across infrastructure, security review, dependency maintenance and contribution. These responsibilities continue after software is adopted and cannot be assumed to exist indefinitely through volunteer capacity, one-off grants, donated services or event revenue. Current proposals differ on the mechanism, but increasingly treat stewardship as capacity that organisations and institutions have to plan and fund.

That makes this week’s question narrower than whether Drupal needs stewardship. It is who pays, for what, and on what recurring basis. With voting in the 2026 Drupal Association at-large board election open until 14 August 2026 at 23:59 UTC, those choices are also part of a live governance decision.

Follow The DropTimes on LinkedIn, X, Bluesky, and Facebook, or join #thedroptimes on Drupal Slack.

This issue of Editor’s Pick was written and curated by Allen Jason.

  • James Abrahams Makes Sustainable Funding a Focus of Board Candidacy

  • Helge Notø Makes Open-Source Stewardship a Focus of Board Candidacy